jump to navigation

Field of the invention, and analogous art August 8, 2012

Posted by Brian Schar in General.

The BPAI issued a nonprecedential opinion today in Ex parte Bo Xia.  The applicants’ Field of the Invention was detailed but not particularly limiting vis a vis the contents of their claims.  The Field was directed to bonding galvanized surfaces.  The Board found that, based on the Field, a patent directed to pigment emulsion was not analogous art and could not be used in an obviousness rejection.  This is a great example of how a properly-crafted Field of the Invention can be nonlimiting and also can be tremendously useful in overcoming 103 rejections.


No comments yet — be the first.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: